data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/231f7/231f7dba8d89f517f14f3d2f0927c17ea437b585" alt=""
So the BBFC has admitted that no causal link has been found tying "violent" video games (correctly phrased: video games depicting violent behavior) with "violent" behavior itself, but says that further study must be done before ruling out the possibility.
Yes, the article speaks for itself.
And I speak for myself as well; here's where I derail the topic:
Has anybody else noticed that the same conservatives who reject evidence of things like global warming and damage to ecosystems by industrialists due to politics and a lack of "conclusive" evidence have jumped on the goose chase of violent video games as a political issue? Despite the fact that their evidence is insubstantial and biased at best, especially when compared with the aforementioned environmental issues? Hmm. That's more than a double standard - it's just sad.
The evidence connecting video games legislation to violence, however, is stunning. Just look at unhinged reactionary nutball Jack Thompson. The ambulances were just a little too fast for him during his Law internship so he's forgone them for the slower-moving targets of the video game industry.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for commenting - I reserve the right only to delete ads, nonsensical spam or comments indistinguishable from such.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.